tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30853315.post8470672582891061475..comments2007-10-19T12:44:01.850+10:00mehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13985323214763082108noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30853315.post-64712060085401856722007-10-19T12:44:01.850+10:002007-10-19T12:44:01.850+10:00Your somewhat cynical comment needs careful consideration. Mark has addressed it well, pointing out the deeper effect of our policy, but there is more to add.<BR/><BR/>http://www.digitalmoneyworld.com/pecunix-takes-proactive-approach-to-curbing-hyip-ponzis/<BR/><BR/>You write “I’ve always read that Pecunix says NO to ponzi hyips”… but how does a business such as Pecunix effectively do this?<BR/><BR/>If you are suggesting that Pecunix should simply close the offending accounts, you are suggesting the exact same solution that e-gold tried, and which obviously failed dismally. By doing this, we would simply start a vicious circle, or a race with the Ponzi operators, where they set the rules and have all the advantages, and ultimately the Ponzi victims lose. In such a scenario, the Ponzi simply opens a new account and their “investors” never know that there is a problem. When the new account is discovered and closed, the whole cycle starts again, and there is absolutely no assistance or notification to potential victims.<BR/><BR/>Pecunix exists as a service to its customers, not as an authoritarian dictator of rules and behavior. We believe our policy offers the best possible service to our customers, educating and notifying them of risks, but not dictating their actions.Rathttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16507118776912460485noreply@blogger.com